How we run it
Oxford-style debates with two prepared sides, a moderator, and an audience that votes before and after. Each side gets time to make their case and to cross-examine the other. The goal is not to win — it is to find out what the strongest version of each position actually looks like. We deliberately invite people who are sceptical of the safety framing, not to balance the room but because that is how you stress-test an argument. The audience shift from pre-vote to post-vote is the most interesting data point. We're planning to run these — date TBD.
Debates are planned for later this year — sign up to stay in the loop.