Structured, steel-manned arguments on contested questions in AI safety. Oxford-style format — not yet scheduled.

How it works
Oxford-style debates with two prepared sides, a moderator, and an audience that votes before and after. Each side gets time to make their case and to cross-examine the other. The goal is not to win — it is to find out what the strongest version of each position actually looks like. We deliberately invite people who are sceptical of the safety framing, not to balance the room but because that is how you stress-test an argument. The audience shift from pre-vote to post-vote is the most interesting data point. We're planning to run these — date TBD.
Tell us a little about yourself and we'll let you know about sessions that fit. No background in AI required — just curiosity and a willingness to argue in good faith.
